A Comparison of Acquired Port-wine Stain with Congenital Port-wine Stain Using an Image Analyzer | Zendy

Jung Ju Lee | Zendy; Jae Chul Lee | Zendy; ByungSoo Kim | Zendy; Weon Ju Lee | Zendy; SeokJong Lee | Zendy; Do Won Kim | Zendy; Yun Hwan Jang | Zendy; Han Ik Bae | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Comparison of Acquired Port-wine Stain with Congenital Port-wine Stain Using an Image Analyzer

Author(s) -

Jung Ju Lee,

Jae Chul Lee,

ByungSoo Kim,

Weon Ju Lee,

SeokJong Lee,

Do Won Kim,

Yun Hwan Jang,

Han Ik Bae

Publication year - 2008

Publication title -

annals of dermatology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.385

H-Index - 37

eISSN - 2005-3894

pISSN - 1013-9087

DOI - 10.5021/ad.2008.20.1.1

Subject(s) - port wine stain , medicine , stain , spectrum analyzer , pathology , chromatography , staining , optics , laser , physics , chemistry

Recent reports have proposed that there were no differences between acquired port-wine stain (APWS) and congenital port-wine stain (CPWS) except the onset of disease. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy is regarded as the treatment of choice in PWS. Although in some articles, APWS might have shown a better response to PDL than CPWS, this is still controversial. It has been assumed however, that there might be some differences determining therapeutic responses between the two entities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research