z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Manejo postoperatorio de catéter doble J en ureteroscopias, síntomas y complicaciones
Author(s) -
Jesús Sebastián Muruato-Araiza,
Irving Reyna-Blanco,
Aldo Jiménez-García,
Alan Martínez-Salas,
R. López-Maguey,
Alejandro Hernandez-Mendez,
Pascual Cortés-Raygoza,
Mario Ortega-Gomez,
Iván Calvo-Vázquez,
Iñigo Navarro-Ruesga,
Javier Santamaria-Orozco,
Gerardo Fernández-Noyola,
M. Cantellano-Orozco,
C. Martínez-Arroyo,
J.G. Morales-Montor,
Carlos Pacheco-Gahbler
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
revista mexicana de urología
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 0185-4542
pISSN - 2007-4085
DOI - 10.48193/rmu.v79i6.449
Subject(s) - medicine , gynecology
Background: Currently, a double-J catheter is placed in 70% of patients that undergo ureteroscopy because it is believed to decrease obstruction secondary to ureteral edema or stone fragments. However, catheter placement is not innocuous, given that it can result in a variety of side effects, such as urinary frequency, urgency, hematuria, dysuria, and tenesmus, as well as increase costs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current double-J catheter management in patients after ureteroscopy and the associated postoperative symptoms. Materials and methods: A retrospective study analyzing ureteroscopies performed at the Hospital Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez throughout 2017 on patients above 18 years of age was conducted. Urology service re-admission frequency during the first postoperative week, the symptoms associated with double-J catheter use, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Results: A total of 105 ureteroscopies were registered. Male sex was predominant (55%) and semirigid ureteroscopies were the most prevalent procedures (71%). A double-J catheter was preoperatively placed in 69 patients and postoperatively placed in 41 patients. During follow-up, the patients with double-J catheter placement presented with associated symptoms warranting an emergency room visit. Pollakiuria was the only significant association found (p=0.001). Ninety-five patients were stone-free, 61 (64.2%) of whom had double-J catheter placement. Two patients with no catheter presented with residual stones. Conclusions: Of the 61 patients with double-J catheter, 57 (82%) presented with at least one symptom related to catheter placement. A total of 64.2% patients with a double-J catheter had uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Therefore, we believe it is necessary to conduct a randomized, prospective study with a larger number of patients to confirm the previously reported results and more clearly and objectively establish the indications for double-J catheter use at our hospital.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom