English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BackgroundIndia achieved the goal of ‘leprosy elimination’ by reducing the burden of leprosy to less than one case per 10,000 inhabitants in 2005. Sustained and committed efforts by national programmes have led to a decline in the burden of leprosy to a great extent.PurposeTo examine the spatial clustering of leprosy case detection and spatiotemporal trend using Bayesian space period model.MaterialsThe National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) data of annual new case detection of leprosy in 34 districts of Maharashtra for eight data years 2007–08 to 2014–15.MethodsThe presence of spatial dependency was assessed using the case detection rate for each of the eight data years spanning from 2007–2015 using Moran’s I statistic and the variation over space and time was modeled using the Bayesian Space Period model.ResultsThe Moran’s I value was found to be statistically significant for each of the time period. The period effect was significantly higher than the average in the year 2007(4%), 2009(5%), 2011(6%), 2013(18%) and significantly lower than the average in 2008(7%), 2010(4%), 2012(11%), 2014(9%). The spatial effects varied between0·579 and 1·52. There was a higher risk of leprosy (50% or more) found in districts of Garhchiroli, Raigad and Warda. The lowest risk of 0·579 was observed in the Nagpur district.ConclusionThe period effect of new case detection of leprosy using the SP model, measured in terms of relative risk shows a seesaw effect at work in districts of Maharashtra. The alternate jump in the risk of leprosy given by the model could be the actual scenario or due to expended activities in the study area. Further in depthinvestigation needed to ascertain the facts. Observing the spatial Bayesian effect districts Garhchiroli, Raigad and Warda are at greater risk and need priority care.

Spatial and temporal trends in new case detection of leprosy in India