z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lebensalter und Philosophie
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
schweizer archiv für neurologie und psychiatrie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1661-3686
pISSN - 0258-7661
DOI - 10.4414/sanp.2005.01587
Subject(s) - philosophy
Is there a specific or preferred phase of life predestined for philosophising? How many years are necessary to start philosophising? Or is it bound to a certain age and ends after that age? It depends on the kind of philosophising. Philosophising can be thinking of the absent things. This happens in conversation with oneself. Children start with this kind of thinking not until they are ten years old. Professional philosophers need a lot of experience in living and thinking. Their main works therefore are rarely written before the age of thirty. However, philosophising can also mean wondering and being amazed while perceiving concrete situations. Children start very early with it. Their permanent questions "why" or "what for" are the questions for causality and meaning respectively. Children also form early moral judgements. Partly they adopt norms, partly they have emotional insights and partly they develop a feeling for justice. A child can conclude from a single death that we all will die. It starts from a concrete death that hurts and turns to a problem. This problem leads to a general question. With this question it discovers a kind of law. Some simple steps of thinking lead to an insight. A general view of the world and human beings will be constructed after a lot of steps. Since the day of birth we have had contact with the social world and the world of things, which influence our views. The arch of life is a common model since the early Middle Ages and is based on the power of life. The more power you have, the less help you need in this model. At the beginning of life you need much help, after some years you are able to work and to help others, but in old age you lose power and you again need help. This arch of life is based on one dimension only. But every phase of life has its own qualities, which are overlooked in this model. There are parallels in the naturalistic models that say that there is a blossom, then a ripe fruit and finally the phase of rotting. In other words, the very young and the very old people are not "proper" persons. We talk about the many old people and think there are too many old people and we exclude a lot of people from human rights: children. Freeing oneself from a wrong kind of thinking makes it possible to see that in every phase of life there is a mortal and a creative aspect. We are mortal from the beginning and can be creative in the phase of dying.There are children who are more mature than the "mature" persons and there are old people who are more energetic than those in the "best" years. The best age is every time - it depends on the quality we are focusing on. Thinking this way, we can give back human dignity to both children and elderly people.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom