z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Preincisional and Postincisional 0.25% Levobupivacaine Infiltration in Thyroid Surgery
Author(s) -
Mine Ekinci,
Birzat Emre Gölboyu,
Ayşe Nur Yeksan,
Onur Dülgeroğlu,
Murat Aksun,
Pınar Karaca Baysal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the annals of clinical and analytical medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2667-663X
DOI - 10.4328/jcam.4707
Subject(s) - levobupivacaine , medicine , infiltration (hvac) , thyroid , anesthesia , geography , bupivacaine , meteorology
Aim: The use of local anesthetics for pain management following neck surgery is not a well-studied field. Material and Method: Sixty patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Wound infiltration with 0.25% levobupivacaine was performed before the incision in Group 1 and at the end of surgery in Group 2. Pain scores and side effects were followed for 24 hours. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption and first analgesic requirement time were recorded for each patient. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated at the end of 24 hours. Results: Lower pain scores, less analgesic consumption, later analgesic requirement and better patient satisfaction were obtained in the preincisional infiltration group.Discussion: Local anesthetic infiltration is a safe, practical method of pain management following thyroid surgery. Preincisional wound infiltration gives better results

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom