English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Financial support: None. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article. Submitted: November 24, 2019. Accepted: December 25, 2019. The study was carried out at Obras Sociais Irmã Du lce (OSID), Salvador, BA, Brasil. Article among the 5 finalists of Jorge Fairbanks Barbosa award at the 17th Brazilian Congress of Head and Neck Surgery in 2019. Abstract Introduction: Head and neck (H&N) neoplasms present high epidemiologic importance regarding the incidence and prevalence of cancer in Brazil and worldwide. The 2005 National Cancer Care Policy brought important changes, including the creation of codes in the SIGTAP table for different surgical specialties. The Pressman and Wildavsky’s Public Policy Implementation Theory was used to explain the implementation model of this policy. This study innovates by presenting a systematic review of the SIGTAP table codes in force, used by H&N surgeons, showing the discrepancy between what is proposed, the reality in the execution of procedures, and the gap in the amounts paid for medical fees and the values allocated for hospital services. Objective: To demonstrate that the SUS-SIGTAP table, with regard to surgical procedures performed by H&N surgeons, is not in accordance with reality both in terms of effectiveness and values allocated. Methods: Bibliographic, documentary and legislation search were conducted between 2005 and 2019. Results: The SIGTAP table is not in accordance with the execution of procedures and presents a gap regarding the amounts paid. Conclusion: The codes need to be readjusted to meet reality in several variables, such as the ICD, description, purpose, values allocated, and new technologies.

DATASUS and head and neck surgery: proposition for adequacy of codes for the SIGTAP oncological table