Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC. A dog study. | Zendy

José Luís CalvoGuirado | Zendy; Antonio AguilarSalvatierra | Zendy; J Guardía | Zendy; Rafael DelgadoRuiz | Zendy; Maria Piedad Ramírez Fernández | Zendy; Consuelo Pérez Sánchez | Zendy; Gerardo GómezMoreno | Zendy

Open Access

Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC. A dog study.

Author(s) -

José Luís CalvoGuirado,

Antonio AguilarSalvatierra,

J Guardía,

Rafael DelgadoRuiz,

Maria Piedad Ramírez Fernández,

Consuelo Pérez Sánchez,

Gerardo GómezMoreno

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

journal of clinical and experimental dentistry

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.481

H-Index - 23

ISSN - 1989-5488

DOI - 10.4317/jced.50624

Subject(s) - implant , premolar , dentistry , beagle , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , scanning electron microscope , dental implant , magnification , osseointegration , materials science , molar , biomedical engineering , medicine , surgery , biology , botany , computer science , composite material , computer vision , genus

[corrected] The aim of this study was to determine which of three methods for measuring BIC (bone-to-implant contact), using vestibular and lingual scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for different implant systems at 15, 30 and 90 days post-surgery was the most precise. An elemental analysis with SEM was used to evaluate neoformed bone composition for three implant systems at the same study times.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research