Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities Using an Orientation OSCE: Identifying the Gaps
Author(s) -
Sheena CarlLee,
Jane Rowat,
Manish Suneja
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of graduate medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.541
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1949-8349
pISSN - 1949-8357
DOI - 10.4300/jgme-d-18-00601.2
Subject(s) - objective structured clinical examination , checklist , medical education , preparedness , formative assessment , curriculum , baseline (sea) , orientation (vector space) , psychology , summative assessment , medicine , pedagogy , oceanography , geometry , mathematics , cognitive psychology , political science , law , geology
Background A residency program's intern cohort is comprised of individuals from different medical schools that place varying levels of emphasis on Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (CEPAERs). Program directors have expressed concerns about the preparedness of medical school graduates. Though guiding principles for implementation of the CEPAERs have been published, studies using this framework to assess interns' baseline skills during orientation are limited. Objective A CEPAER-based objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was implemented with the aims to (1) assess each intern's baseline clinical skills and provide formative feedback; (2) determine an intern's readiness for resident responsibilities; (3) inform individualized education plans; and (4) address identified gaps through curricular change. Methods During orientation, all 33 interns from internal medicine (categorical, preliminary, and medicine-psychiatry) participated in the OSCE. Six 20-minute stations evaluated 8 EPAs. Faculty completed a global assessment, and standardized patients completed a communications checklist and global assessment. All interns completed a self-assessment of baseline skills and a post-OSCE survey. Results Stations assessing handoffs, informed consent, and subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) note were the lowest-performing stations. Interns performed lower in skills for which they did not report previous training. Formal instruction was incorporated into didactic sessions for the lowest-performing stations. The majority of interns indicated that the assessment was useful, and immediate feedback was beneficial. Conclusions This OSCE during orientation offers just-in-time baseline information regarding interns' critical skills and may lead to individualized feedback as well as continuous curricular improvement.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom