English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the coexistence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and cervical disc herniations (CDH)\udin patients with neck and upper back pain.\udMaterials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients having only MTrPs were defined as group-1, patients having only CDH were\uddefined as group-2, patients having both MTrPs and CDH were defined as Group-3. Two hundred twenty three patients (151 females/72\udmales; mean age 38.2±10.1 years) were enrolled in this study. There were 30 patients in group 1, 46 patients in group 2, 147 patients in\udgroup 3.\udResults: Thirty eight patients had radiculopathy, 27 of them had MTrP(s). There was no significant difference in terms of CDH level\ud(p=0.275) and degree of herniation (p=0.188) between groups 2 and 3. There was no significant difference in terms of MTrP localisation\ud(p=0.684) between groups 1 and 3. There was no significant difference in terms of MTrP localisations according to CDH level and nerve root\udcompression level in groups 3.\udConclusion: MTrP and CDH coexistence is frequent. Management of the pain in the upper back region should be based on whether if the\udpain originates from MTrP, CDH or bot

Coexistence of Miyofascial Trigger Points and Cervical Disc Herniation: Which One is the Main Source of Pain?