z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse
Author(s) -
Esra Nur Tola,
Evrim Erdemoğlu,
Ebru Erdemoğlu
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of turkish society of obstetric and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1307-7007
pISSN - 1307-699X
DOI - 10.4274/tjod.43179
Subject(s) - medicine , uterus , surgery , sexual function , robotic surgery , laparoscopy , laparoscopic surgery , general surgery
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the protrusion of pelvic organs to the vagen and is an important health problem in patients of older age. Today, most women with POP prefer uterine sparing surgery due to the changes in lifestyle, beliefs, pregnancy desire, and understanding the role of the uterus and cervix in sexual function. Therefore, the need for newer surgical procedures that involve less invasive surgery, reduced intraoperative and postoperative risks, and a faster healing time in POP surgery have gained importance. Vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic methods are defined in uterine preserving surgery but there is not yet a consensus on which of them should be chosen. In choosing the proper technique, the patient's general status, accompanying disease, correct indication, and the surgeon's experience are all important. In our practice we prefer laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy in patients who prefer to preserve their uterus because of the lower costs and high success rates compared with abdominal and robotic techniques.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom