English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: To compare the visual prognosis and postoperative complication rates of secondary anterior chamber (AC IOL) and scleralfixated\ud(SF) intraocular lenses (IOL) after complicated phacoemulsification surgery.\udMaterials and Methods: Thirty eyes of thirty patients were reviewed for this retrospective study. The patients with secondary AC IOL\udimplantation formed group 1 (n=15), and the patients with secondary SF IOL implantation formed group 2 (n=15). Best-corrected visual\udacuity (BCVA) with Snellen chart, biomicroscopic examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with applanation tonometer,\udgonioscopy performed by Goldmann’s 3-mirror contact lens, and fundus examination were performed preoperatively in all patients.\udResults: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative BCVA (p=0.492) and postoperative success (BCVA not\udchanged or better postoperatively) between the 2 groups (p=0.598). Postoperative success rate was 80% in group 1 and 93.7% in\udGroup 2. The postoperative cylindrical power of the eyes did not differ significantly between the groups (p=0.220). The postoperative\udcomplications in group 1 were as follows: transient corneal edema in 5 eyes, transient IOP elevation in 2 eyes, postoperative fibrinous\udreaction in the anterior chamber in one eye, late-onset secondary glaucoma in one eye, hyphema in one eye, cystoid macular edema in one\udeye, vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber in one eye, and IOL malposition in one eye. The postoperative complications in group\ud2 were as follows: transient corneal edema in 3 eyes, vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber in 2 eyes, IOL malposition in 2 eyes,\udtransient IOP elevation in one eye, and retinal detachment in one eye.\udConclusion: In this study, both IOL types were observed to be preferable in cases without adequate capsular support following\udcomplicated cataract surgery. However, further studies with large numbers of patients are needed to define the best choice of IOL in\udpatients with inadequate capsular support. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2014; 44: 102-7

türk oftalmoloji dergisi

Komplikasyonlu Fakoemülsifikasyon Cerrahisi Sonrasında Sekonder Ön Kamara ve Sekonder Skleral Fiksasyonlu Göziçi Lens İmplantasyonları Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması