Comparison of Ceftriaxone and Cefazolin Sodium Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Terms of SIRS/Urosepsis Rates in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy | Zendy

Kerem Taken | Zendy; Alper Aşık | Zendy; Recep Eryılmaz | Zendy; Rahmi Aslan | Zendy; Muhammet İrfan Dönmez | Zendy; Mustafa Güneş | Zendy

Open Access

Comparison of Ceftriaxone and Cefazolin Sodium Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Terms of SIRS/Urosepsis Rates in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Author(s) -

Kerem Taken,

Alper Aşık,

Recep Eryılmaz,

Rahmi Aslan,

Muhammet İrfan Dönmez,

Mustafa Güneş

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

journal of urological surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2148-9580

DOI - 10.4274/jus.galenos.2018.2367

Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous nephrolithotomy , cefazolin , ceftriaxone , antibiotic prophylaxis , antibiotics , anesthesia , percutaneous , microbiology and biotechnology , biology

Öz What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Percutaneous nephrolithotomy have infectious complications in the form of systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) and urosepsis. Antibiotic prophylaxis in order to prevent this complication has been widely investigated. Our prospective randomized study highlights two commonly used antibiotics in Turkiye and their effects on infectious complications. Our results indicate similar SIRS/urosepsis rates between groups and hence we advise to use cefazolin that has a narrower anti-bacterial spectrum. Kerem Taken1, Alper Aşık1, Recep Eryılmaz1, Rahmi Aslan1, Muhammet İrfan Dönmez2, Mustafa Güneş1 Comparison of Ceftriaxone and Cefazolin Sodium Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Terms of SIRS/Urosepsis Rates in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Doi: 10.4274/jus.galenos.2018.2367

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research