Reproducibility of 3 mm-Slice-Thick Reconstruction of Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans
Author(s) -
Matti Karjalainen,
Anna JulkunenIivari,
Antti Markkola,
Prasun Dastidar,
Heini Huhtala,
Mikko Suvinen,
Anna-Maija Kuukka,
Markus Rautiainen,
Jura Numminen,
Sanna ToppilaSalmi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
open journal of radiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2164-3024
pISSN - 2164-3032
DOI - 10.4236/ojrad.2016.61006
Subject(s) - medicine , reproducibility , nuclear medicine , paranasal sinuses , sinus (botany) , radiology , tomography , ethmoid sinus , computed tomography , cone beam computed tomography , statistics , botany , mathematics , biology , genus
Background: After the failure of medical treatment, the surgery of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is
planned according to endoscopic and paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) findings. Objective:
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether this study method might be eligible
in studies aiming at radiation dose reduction. Sinus CT scans were chosen as a model because
of the high variation of the radiological anatomy of surgically important sinonasal structures. We
hypothesized that 3 mm-slice-thick reconstruction CT had poor reproducibility. Methods: 59 CRS
patients underwent routine multi-detector sinus CT (CTMD). CT3mm was reconstructed from CTMD
data-sets. Lund-Mackay (LM) scores and 43 other structural parameters were analyzed blinded.
Agreement was studied between CTMD and CT3mm (intra-observer reproducibility), and between
three observers (inter-observer reproducibility) by using Cohen’s kappa. Results: The inter-observer
agreement was moderate (kappa 0.4 - 0.6, p < 0.01) in the majority of structures of CT3mm
scans. The intra-observer reproducibility of CT3mm scans was very good in most structures, however,
it was poor in important structures such as frontal and spheno-ethmoid recess, lamina pa-pyracae, and location of optic nerve or anterior ethmoidal artery. The grade of surgeon’s confidence
of CT3mm in comparison to CTMD was lower (kappa 0.2 - 0.4, P < 0.05). Conclusion: This methodology
might have some use in studies aiming at radiation dose reduction. As was expected, 3
mm-slice-thick reconstruction CT had poor reproducibility and surgeon’s confidence. More recent
methods such as cone beam computed tomography scans have nowadays more relevant dose reduction potentia
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom