A Comparative Analysis of Aerosol Microphysical, Optical and Radiative Properties during the Spring Festival Holiday over Beijing and Surrounding Regions
Author(s) -
Yu Zheng,
Huizheng Che,
Xiangao Xia,
Yaqiang Wang,
Hujia Zhao,
Hong Wang,
Víctor Estellés,
Linchang An,
Ke Gui,
Tianze Sun,
Boshi Kang,
Deguang Zhang,
Chunyang Zhao,
Chong Liu,
Zhuozhi Shu,
Yongliang Sun,
Bingbo Huang,
Rongfan Chai,
Tianliang Zhao,
Xiaoye Zhang
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
aerosol and air quality research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 2071-1409
pISSN - 1680-8584
DOI - 10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0396
Subject(s) - aerosol , radiative forcing , single scattering albedo , angstrom exponent , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , beijing , albedo (alchemy) , radiative transfer , atmosphere (unit) , forcing (mathematics) , optical depth , spring (device) , meteorology , climatology , geography , physics , geology , optics , china , thermodynamics , art history , art , performance art , archaeology
Using ground-based data, meteorological observations, and atmospheric environmental monitoring data, a comparative analysis of the microphysical and optical properties, and radiative forcing of aerosols was conducted between three stations in different developed environments during a severe air pollution episode during the Spring Festival over Beijing. During the most polluted period, the daily peak values of the aerosol optical depth were ~1.62, ~1.73, and ~0.74, which were about 2.6, 2.9, and 2.1 times higher than the background levels at the CAMS, Xianghe, and Shangdianzi sites, respectively. The daily peak values of the single scattering albedo were ~0.95, ~0.96, and ~0.87. The volume of fine-mode particles varied from 0.04 to 0.21 µm3 µm–2, 0.06 to 0.17 µm3 µm–2, and 0.01 to 0.10 µm3 µm–2, which were about 0.3 to 5.8, 1.1 to 4.7, and 1.2 to 8.9 times greater than the background values, respectively. The daily absorption aerosol optical depth was ~0.01 to ~0.13 at CAMS, ~0.03 to ~0.14 at Xianghe, and ~0.01 to ~0.09 at Shangdianzi, and the absorption Angstrom exponents reflected a significant increase in organic aerosols over CAMS and Xianghe and in black carbon over Shangdianzi. Aerosol radiative forcing at the bottom of the atmosphere varied from –20 to –130, –40 to –150, and –10 to –110 W m–2 for the whole holiday period, indicating the cooling effect. The potential source contribution function and concentration-weighted trajectory analysis showed that Beijing, the southern parts of Hebei and Shanxi, and the central northern part of Shandong contributed greatly to the pollution.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom