z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Low-Cost Device for Bulk Sampling of Airborne Particulate Matter: Evaluation of an Ionic Charging Device
Author(s) -
Nima AfsharMohajer,
Wesley H. Godfrey,
Ana M. Rule,
Elizabeth C. Matsui,
Julian Gordon,
Kirsten Koehler
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
aerosol and air quality research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 2071-1409
pISSN - 1680-8584
DOI - 10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0423
Subject(s) - particulates , sampling (signal processing) , environmental science , ionic bonding , environmental chemistry , chemistry , computer science , ion , telecommunications , organic chemistry , detector
Bulk sampling of aerosols is often needed for the determination of physical properties, chemical composition and toxicity assessments of airborne particulate matter. Conventional aerosol samplers have several limitations for use as bulk aerosol collectors including cost, noise levels, power requirements associated with the use of a pump, limited flow rate, and a relatively long sampling time needed to collect sufficient mass to achieve gravimetric or other method limits of detection. In this study, a low-cost ionic charging device (ICD) was evaluated that addresses many of the drawbacks of conventional aerosol samplers. Different types of particles including incense fume, Arizona Road Dust (ARD) powders and Polystyrene Latex (PSL) spheres of different sizes were aerosolized then sampled using three ICDs and compared to conventional inhalable and PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 100 µm and 2.5 µm, respectively) aerosol samplers in a controlled laboratory chamber at varying concentrations. The device was also evaluated in indoor environments. ICDs operate at almost 18.5 times higher flow rate than conventional personal samplers and provided up to 9 times greater total collected mass compared to the conventional samplers over the same time frame. Using a regression analysis, aerosol-specific linear equations with slopes (CPM2.5/CICD) from 1.21 to 7.10 and R2 from 0.74 to 0.99 for estimating the inhalable and PM2.5 mass concentrations using the ICD were derived. This study suggests that the ICD provides a less accurate estimate of size-selective PM mass concentrations than conventional personal aerosol samplers; however, it collects coarse particles efficiently and increases total sampled mass per time at a lower cost and without noise associated with traditional sampling methods. Therefore, the ICD can be used as a bulk aerosol collector for composition analyses and in-vitro toxicology tests of coarse PM.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom