English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

−Dαa α i (x,Du) = −Dαf α i (x) on Ω ⊂ R , i = 1, . . . , N, α = 1, . . . , n (1.1) belong to C(Ω,R). 1 The system (1.1) has been extensively studied. S. Campanato in [2],[3] proved that (under suitable assumptions) Du ∈ L loc (Ω,R ) with λ 2. From a series of counterexamples starting from famous De Giorgi work (see [6] ) it is well known that Du need not be continuous or even bounded (see [8], [10], [13], [16], [17]) for n > 2. Higher smoothness of coefficients does not improve the smoothness of a solution, as there are examples (see [14]) where the coefficients are real analytic while Du is bounded and discontinuous. On the other hand, it follows immediately from so called direct proof of partial regularity (see [7], [5])that if modulus of continuity of ∂ai ∂p β is small enough then Du is Holder continuous. For this

Remarks on $C^{1,\gamma}$-Regularity of Weak Solutions to Elliptic Systems with BMO Gradients