English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the theory of p-summing operators studied by Pietsch we know that π2(C(K), H) = πp(C(K), H) for any Hilbert space H and any p such that 2 < p < +∞. In this paper we prove that this equality is not true in the same notion generalized by Junge and Pisier to operator spaces, i.e. πl2(B(l2), OH) (= π 0 2(B(l2), OH)) 6= πlp(B(l2), OH).

Comparison of Non-Commutative 2- and $p$-Summing Operators from $B(l_2)$ into $OH$