The Ivory Tower of Academia and How Mental Health is Often Neglected

Whether you are in the thick of graduate school or a tenured professor struggling to obtain the next grant, the truth is, academia operates in a culture of extreme competitiveness. I am certainly not the first person to make the ‘ivory tower’ metaphor when describing the academic environment. Even in the best departments, egos run unchecked and many are not held accountable for their actions on how they treat their students, colleagues and collaborators. Increasing competitiveness for grants and publications, the privatization of universities, a decline in tenured faculty positions, low pay and minimal benefits are just some of the stressors academics face [1]. With all of this, it is no wonder that mental health is a serious issue in academia and it is imperative that we talk honestly about how it is affecting the scientific enterprise. As someone who has recently obtained their PhD, I can say with certainty that I had a great graduate education at a top school; I was able to attend conferences, published a few papers and had access to excellent training and instrumentation that prepared me well for my current postdoctoral position. However, I cannot deny that for a majority of graduate school I was depressed and struggled with mental health issues along with job related issues (e.g., switching advisors and sexual harassment). Anxiety and depression can affect anyone and graduate students are particularly vulnerable; an article in C&EN News reported on the suicide of a graduate student and highlighted how easily mental health can decline while pursuing a PhD [2]. In 2018, there was a published study in Nature which found that 40% of the 2279 students surveyed around the world had anxiety and depression scores in the moderate to severe range [3]. Graduate students are placed in a tenuous position with the duality of being both a student and an employee. You are expected to teach courses and conduct lab work for which the university profits, but when it comes to matters regarding benefits, pay and other job-related support, you are treated like a student. Moreover, there is no regulation of the number of hours students work, vacation time and how you are treated by your superiors. In USA, much to the chagrin of neoliberal universities, there has been an increase of graduate students unionizing to improve their quality of life and to take some control over their working conditions [4]. Many of the mental health challenges faced in graduate school carry over into the behaviors and methods of future academics; thus, the vicious cycle continues. After completing a PhD, moving to a new institution and starting a new position in academia, these problems do not go away. Academics are notorious for having competitions on who is suffering the most. There are countless stories of late hours, working through weekends and not taking vacations, all under the guise that the work being done is more noble than nonacademics. The fallout of this is poor physical and mental health and a deterioration of one’s personal life. Friendships, family and social life all fall by the wayside and you lose sight of who you are as a person outside of your position. Academia is built on the exploitation of often well-meaning academics, but the higher you rise, the greater the workload, the greater the pressure and the greater the fall. What is worse, if you try to achieve the sought-after work–life balance, you are seen as not working hard enough and judged by your colleagues. In my efforts to avoid this, I volunteered with my local section of the American Chemical Society since the beginning of my PhD, which gave me a nonlab work related outlet, helping me develop skills and make new friends and contacts. Naturally, I was criticized by my colleagues for not being committed enough to my lab work, but it was the best decision I made and ensured I had marketable skills outside of the ivory tower.