Incurred sample reproducibility and stability assessment in a cell-based drug concentration assay
Author(s) -
Joleen T. White,
Mary Crossman,
Meena Subramanyam
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
bioanalysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.566
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1757-6199
pISSN - 1757-6180
DOI - 10.4155/bio.15.47
Subject(s) - bioanalysis , bioequivalence , reproducibility , drug development , sample (material) , chromatography , biochemical engineering , computational biology , medicine , medical physics , computer science , chemistry , pharmacology , drug , biology , engineering , bioavailability
Joleen White is Principal Scientist in Translational Sciences at Biogen Idec. Throughout her career, she has applied her background in biophysical protein chemistry to pharmaceutical development in therapeutic indications with significant unmet medical need. In her current role, she supports method development and regulated bioanalysis of biomarkers, biopharmaceuticals, and immunogenicity in biological samples from nonclinical and clinical studies. Her experience with measuring macromolecules includes enzymes, monoclonal antibodies, Fc fusions, oligonucleotides, PEGylated proteins, and other novel protein constructs. She has supported studies from discovery through all phases of development including GLP nonclinical, clinical, and post-marketing commitments. Incurred samplereproducibility is one aspect of in-study validation, with white papers outlining expectations for chromatographic assays and immunoassays. This manuscript outlines an approach for performing incurred sample reproducibility for a bioequivalence study using a cell-based assay, with the complication of time elapsed between original and repeat assays. The incurred sample reproducibility passed the pre-established acceptance criteria of 45% for at least 2/3 of the samples: 174/216 samples (80.6%). Data trends between the two crossover arms were qualitatively similar. The passed incurred sample reproducibility and stability further supports the validity of the original study conclusion that the two manufacturing processes were bioequivalent. This illustrates one approach to extrapolating industry and regulatory recommendations for situations outside current guidance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom