THE EFFECTS OF APPLYING PARAQUAT, ATRAZINE AND SIMAZINE FOR WEED CONTROL IN RASPBERRIES IN COASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA
Author(s) -
Jack A. Freeman
Publication year - 1967
Publication title -
canadian journal of plant science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.338
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1918-1833
pISSN - 0008-4220
DOI - 10.4141/cjps67-004
Subject(s) - simazine , atrazine , paraquat , weed control , weed , agronomy , perennial plant , blowing a raspberry , horticulture , biology , pesticide , biochemistry
Early spring and fall applications of a mixture of paraquat 2.2 kg and simazine 2.2 to 3.4 kg/ha repeated over a 3-year period provided excellent weed control without adversely affecting raspberry yield. Paraquat 2.2 kg/ha applied in April gave good broadleaf weed control for 2 months and fairly good grass control for 3 months. Fall applications suppressed grasses and controlled winter annuals through to spring. Combining paraquat with simazine eliminated the need for pre-treatment hoeing or cultivation and prolonged weed control. Atrazine 3.4 and 5.6 kg/ha applied in the spring resulted in excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds. But, fall applications were not as effective for weed control as the paraquat and hoe-plus-simazine treatments. Atrazine 5.6 kg/ha caused chlorosis and necrosis of the raspberry leaves and reduced yields. Simazine, on the other hand, caused little or no leaf injury, but it also reduced yields at the 5.6-kg rate. Fruit quality was not affected significantly by any treatment, although atrazine and simazine tended to increase ascorbic acid content.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom