English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Early spring and fall applications of a mixture of paraquat 2.2 kg and simazine 2.2 to 3.4 kg/ha repeated over a 3-year period provided excellent weed control without adversely affecting raspberry yield. Paraquat 2.2 kg/ha applied in April gave good broadleaf weed control for 2 months and fairly good grass control for 3 months. Fall applications suppressed grasses and controlled winter annuals through to spring. Combining paraquat with simazine eliminated the need for pre-treatment hoeing or cultivation and prolonged weed control. Atrazine 3.4 and 5.6 kg/ha applied in the spring resulted in excellent control of grass and broadleaf weeds. But, fall applications were not as effective for weed control as the paraquat and hoe-plus-simazine treatments. Atrazine 5.6 kg/ha caused chlorosis and necrosis of the raspberry leaves and reduced yields. Simazine, on the other hand, caused little or no leaf injury, but it also reduced yields at the 5.6-kg rate. Fruit quality was not affected significantly by any treatment, although atrazine and simazine tended to increase ascorbic acid content.

THE EFFECTS OF APPLYING PARAQUAT, ATRAZINE AND SIMAZINE FOR WEED CONTROL IN RASPBERRIES IN COASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA