z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Model comparison and estimation of genetic parameters for body weight in commercial broilers
Author(s) -
G. Maniatis,
Nikolaos Demiris,
Andreas Kranis,
Georgios Banos,
A. Kominakis
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
canadian journal of animal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.377
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1918-1825
pISSN - 0008-3984
DOI - 10.4141/cjas2012-070
Subject(s) - akaike information criterion , bayesian information criterion , statistics , heritability , bivariate analysis , mathematics , univariate , deviance information criterion , restricted maximum likelihood , standard error , genetic correlation , maternal effect , bayesian probability , zoology , biology , bayesian inference , multivariate statistics , estimation theory , genetic variation , genetics , pregnancy , gene , offspring
Maniatis, G., Demiris, N., Kranis, A., Banos, G. and Kominakis, A. 2013. Model comparison and estimation of genetic parameters for body weight in commercial broilers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 67–77. The availability of powerful computing and advances in algorithmic efficiency allow for the consideration of increasingly complex models. Consequently, the development and application of appropriate statistical procedures for model evaluation is becoming increasingly important. This paper is concerned with the application of an alternative model determination criterion (conditional Akaike Information Criterion, cAIC) in a large dataset comprising 203 323 body weights of broilers, pertaining to 7 (BW 7 ) and 35 (BW 35 ) days of age. Seven univariate and seven bivariate models were applied. Direct genetic, maternal genetic and maternal environmental (c 2 ) effects were estimated via REML. The model evaluation criteria included conditional Akaike Information Criterion (cAIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and the standard Akaike Information Criterion (henceforth marginal; mAIC). According to cAIC the best-fitting model included direct genetic, maternal genetic and c 2 effects. Maternal heritabilities were low (0.10 and 0.03) compared to the direct heritabilities (0.17 and 0.21), while c 2 was 0.05 and 0.04 for BW 7 and BW 35 , respectively. BIC and mAIC favoured a model that additionally included a direct-maternal genetic covariance, resulting in highly negative direct-maternal genetic correlations (−0.47 and −0.64 for BW 7 and BW 35 , respectively) and higher direct heritabilities (0.25 and 0.28 for BW 7 and BW 35 , respectively). Results suggest that cAIC can select different animal models than mAIC and BIC with different biological properties.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom