English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Net-revenues of rebreeding policies that differed in the maximum allowable days after calving for breeding were compared using data generated by a dynamic stochastic simulation model of Ontario dairy herds. Such comparisons benefit farmer decision support, as rebreeding decisions are important management choices. Rebreeding up to 168 d after calving only was least optimal. Hence, the rebreeding period should not be too short. At average and high herd fertility, a rebreeding policy under which cows with a mature equivalent milk production level lower than 80%, between 80 and 100%, and greater than 100% of the herd average were not rebred, bred up to 168 d after calving, and bred up to 250 d after calving, respectively, resulted in higher net-revenue than rebreeding policies that used a single cut-off for all cows. Differences in net-revenue between the optimal and the least optimal policy were $217.90 and $114.40 per cow per year for the lowest and highest simulated reproductive performance, respectively. At low herd fertility, rebreeding up to 364 d postpartum was optimal. However, at this level of performance emphasis should be given to improving fertility, rather than choice of rebreeding policy. Key words: Dairy cattle, simulation, economics, insemination policy, rebreeding policy

Comparison of rebreeding policies for Ontario dairy herds