Enteric methane emissions from growing beef cattle as affected by diet and level of intake
Author(s) -
K. A. Beauchemin,
S. M. McGinn
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
canadian journal of animal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.377
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1918-1825
pISSN - 0008-3984
DOI - 10.4141/a06-021
Subject(s) - silage , beef cattle , dry matter , zoology , forage , feedlot , methane emissions , methane , agronomy , chemistry , biology , organic chemistry
A study was conducted to determine whether enteric methane (CH 4 ) emissions from growing feedlot cattle fed backgrounding diets based on barley silage could be reduced through grain supplementation. A second objective was to determine the effects of feed intake on CH 4 emissions. Eight Angus beef heifers (initial and final body weight, 328 ± 28 and 430 ± 29 kg) were used. The experiment was designed as a split-plot crossover with two diets and two 8-week periods. The main plot was the diet [dry matter (DM) basis]: high forage (70% barley silage, 30% barley-based concentrate) or high grain (30% barley silage, 70% corn-based concentrate). The sub-plot was the feeding level: unrestricted (ad libitum feed intake, 5% orts) or restricted (65% of ad libitum intake) feed intake. Methane emissions were measured during each sub-plot over 3 d using whole animal chambers. Changing the forage to concentrate ratio and substituting barley for corn did not affect CH 4 emissions (141.5 g d -1 ; P = 0.26), and the average emission was about 10% higher than the emission calculated using the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Tier 1 approach. Methane conversion rate was also similar for both diets [6.23% of gross energy intake (GEI), P = 0.29], and was similar to the value of 6.0 used in the IPCC Tier 2 approach to calculating CH 4 emissions from cattle. Restricting intake reduced CH 4 emissions (169 vs. 114 g d -1 ; P < 0.002), with the reduction in CH 4 proportional to the decline in intake. Level of intake relative to maintenance energy requirements was moderately inversely related (r = -0.30; P = 0.04) to CH 4 (% GEI). The proportion of GEI lost as CH 4 declined by 0.77 percentage units per unit increase in level of intake above maintenance. This study shows that supplementing barley-silage-based diets with corn grain to increase diet quality has only small effects on reducing CH 4 emissions. In contrast, maximizing feed intake above maintenance energy requirements increases daily CH 4 emissions, but improves efficiency of CH 4 conversion because CH 4 , as a percentage of GEI, declined. Thus, feeding cattle for maximum gain is an important CH 4 mitigation strategy for the cattle industry as it reduces the proportion of feed energy lost as CH 4 each day, as well as, reduces the number of days to market and associated CH 4 production. Key words: Cattle, methane, greenhouse gasses
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom