z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Bupivacaine Lozenge Compared with Lidocaine Spray as Topical Pharyngeal Anesthetic before Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Nesrin Salale,
Charlotte Treldal,
Stine Mogensen,
Mette Rasmussen,
Janne Petersen,
Ove Andersen,
Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical medicine insights gastroenterology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 11
ISSN - 1179-5522
DOI - 10.4137/cgast.s18019
Subject(s) - lozenge , lidocaine , medicine , anesthesia , local anesthetic , bupivacaine , topical anesthetic , visual analogue scale , randomized controlled trial , reflex , surgery , archaeology , history
Unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) can induce patient discomfort, mainly due to a strong gag reflex. The aim was to assess the effect of a bupivacaine lozenge as topical pharyngeal anesthetic compared with standard treatment with a lidocaine spray before UGE. Ninety-nine adult outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic UGE were randomized to receive either a bupivacaine lozenge (L-group, n = 51) or lidocaine spray (S-group, n = 42). Primary objective was assessment of patient discomfort including acceptance of the gag reflex during UGE. The L-group assessed the discomfort significantly lower on a visual analog scale compared with the S-group (P = 0.02). There was also a significant difference in the four-point scale assessment of the gag reflex (P = 0.03). It was evaluated as acceptable by 49% in the L-group compared with 31% in the S-group. A bupivacaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine spray proved to be a superior option as topical pharyngeal anesthetic before an UGE.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom