The Mortgage Interest Deduction: An Example of an Upside Down Federal Government Housing Subsidy
Author(s) -
Frank W. Woodruff
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
policy perspectives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2377-7753
pISSN - 1085-7087
DOI - 10.4079/pp.v21i0.13352
Subject(s) - subsidy , government (linguistics) , shared appreciation mortgage , balance (ability) , investment (military) , tax deduction , subsidized housing , cost of funds index , business , economics , secondary mortgage market , collateralized mortgage obligation , finance , mortgage insurance , public economics , economic policy , interest rate , labour economics , market economy , tax reform , gross income , state income tax , politics , political science , law , philosophy , casualty insurance , linguistics , insurance policy , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation
Federal housing subsidies overwhelmingly benefit homeowners over renters and wealthier Americans over poorer Americans through the US tax code. A better balance in both areas is needed to encourage equitable economic growth. The mortgage interest deduction is the primary driver of this imbalance and is by far the federal government’s largest investment in housing. Further, no evidence exists that the mortgage interest deduction encourages renters to become owners. Rather, its documented effect has been to encourage those who would purchase homes to buy bigger homes. Modest reforms to the mortgage interest deduction are necessary because of its size and inequitable nature. Any and all savings achieved through reforms must be used to balance housing subsidies by providing more resources for low- and moderate-income renters and owners.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom