Collaborative Versus Prescriptive Legislating and Rulemaking: A Case Study of the Driver's License Provisions in the REAL ID Act of 2005 | Zendy

Susan E. Randolph | Zendy

Open Access

Collaborative Versus Prescriptive Legislating and Rulemaking: A Case Study of the Driver's License Provisions in the REAL ID Act of 2005

Author(s) -

Susan E. Randolph

Publication year - 2007

Publication title -

policy perspectives

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2377-7753

pISSN - 1085-7087

DOI - 10.4079/pp.v14i1.4147

Subject(s) - rulemaking , license , state (computer science) , law , government (linguistics) , terrorism , political science , business , public administration , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , algorithm

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and America's engagement in the Global War on Terror have added urgency to long-standing Congressional efforts to strengthen the country's system for establishing personal identification. Randolph examines the REAL ID Act of 2005, which legislates uniform requirements for state drivers' licenses. She describes the way the REAL ID Act became law and is being implemented by the executive branch and outlines the objections of state and local government officials to its driver's license provisions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research