z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Use of Structural Allograft in Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty with Bone Loss
Author(s) -
Raul Kuchinad,
Shawn Garbedian,
Benedict A. Rogers,
David Backstein,
Oleg Safir,
Allan E. Gross
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
advances in orthopedics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.681
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 2090-3472
pISSN - 2090-3464
DOI - 10.4061/2011/578952
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , prosthesis , arthroplasty , bone cement , total knee arthroplasty , cement , archaeology , history
Bone loss around the knee in the setting of total knee arthroplasty remains a difficult and challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. There are a number of options for dealing with smaller and contained bone loss; however, massive segmental bone loss has fewer options. Small, contained defects can be treated with cement, morselized autograft/allograft or metal augments. Segmental bone loss cannot be dealt with through simple addition of cement, morselized autograft/allograft, or metal augments. For younger or higher demand patients, the use of allograft is a good option as it provides a durable construct with high rates of union while restoring bone stock for future revisions. Older patients, or those who are low demand, may be better candidates for a tumour prosthesis, which provides immediate ability to weight bear and mobilize.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom