z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prognostic Significance of Basal Markers in Triple-negative Breast Cancers
Author(s) -
Jun Mo Kim,
Tae Yoon Hwang,
Su Hwan Kang,
Soo Jung Lee,
Young Kyung Bae
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of breast cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 2092-9900
pISSN - 1738-6756
DOI - 10.4048/jbc.2009.12.1.4
Subject(s) - medicine , tissue microarray , immunohistochemistry , breast cancer , oncology , progesterone receptor , lymph node , basal (medicine) , vimentin , estrogen receptor , triple negative breast cancer , epidermal growth factor receptor , pathology , breast carcinoma , cancer , insulin
Purpose: We have investigated the prognostic significance of the expression of basal markers for triple-negative (estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) breast cancers (TNBCs). Methods: An immunohistochemical study was performed on tissue microarrays constructed with 643 invasive breast carcinoma samples. We subclassified the TNBCs into basal phenotype (BP) and non-BP groups by the use of four different criteria according to the immunprofiles for cytokeratin5/6 (CK5/6), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vimentin, c-Kit, p63 and P-cadherin. The criteria consisted of criterion 1: CK5/6+ only, criterion 2: CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+, criterion 3: CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+ and/or vimentin+ and criterion 4: one or more marker(s) positive among the six basal markers. Each of these criteria, as well as the status of each individual marker, was evaluated to estimate prognosis for TNBC patients. Results: Of the breast carcinomas, 165 cases (25.7%) were TNBCs. As compared with the non-TNBCs, TNBCs were associated with a larger tumor size (p=0.001), higher histological grade (p<0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.05). Lymph node status, tumor size and expression of EGFR or c-Kit were independent prognostic factors for patients with TNBC. As compared with the nonBP, BP as defined by criterion 2 was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and DFS among patients with a lymph node metastasis (p=0.044 and p=0.01) and among patients who received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.009 and p=0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with TNBCs showed a poorer prognosis as compared to patients with non-TNBCs. Selected group of the basal-like breast cancers (BLBCs) defined by the immunohistochemical profiles of basal markers showed survival differences from non-BLBCs in subgroups of TNBCs with a homogeneous clinical finding.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom