Democracia e moralidade política na filosofia do direito de Kant: elementos para uma fundamentação do controle de constitucionalidade
Author(s) -
Delamar José Volpato Dutra
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
filosofia unisinos
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.114
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1984-8234
pISSN - 1519-5023
DOI - 10.4013/fsu.2012.132.04
Subject(s) - philosophy , humanities , democracy , political science , politics , law
The study detects a tension in constitutional democracies, as they mix elements arising from liberalism, republicanism and democracy. Two authors are illustrative of this tension. On the one hand, Kant did not see any problem in the combination of republicanism and liberalism, but thought that democracy is incompatible with liberalism. Habermas, on the other hand, sees no tension between republicanism and democracy, but rather between republicanism – which for him is synonymous of constitutional democracy – and liberalism, which is a tradition of thought going back to Carl Schmitt. The text discusses basically how Kant integrates normative elements of law into his philosophy of law, without, however, establishing effective mechanisms to address the deviations from the proposed normative standards. Key words: Kant, liberalism, republicanism, democracy, judicial review.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom