English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The main objective of this article was to identify the advances in the studies of network governance stemming from the seminal work of Provan and Kenis (2008). Their eight propositions examine the characteristics of each form of governance, outline critical contingency components that may explain governance form effectiveness, discuss the tensions inherent in each form of governance, and explore the evolution of network governance over time. To reach this goal we conducted a meta-study of 224 articles, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses to help establish a map of the recent advances in the field of network governance. The joint analysis showed specific advances in the governance of public networks. In general terms, the studies remain highly fragmented and have yet to reach a greater level of consolidation. Although the “Modes of Network Governance”: What Advances Have Been Made So Far?