z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Effects of Breakfast and Breakfast Composition on Cognition in Adults
Author(s) -
Rachel Galioto,
Mary Beth Spitznagel
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
advances in nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.362
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 2156-5376
pISSN - 2161-8313
DOI - 10.3945/an.115.010231
Subject(s) - cognition , context (archaeology) , recall , effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance , psychology , medicine , developmental psychology , cognitive psychology , psychiatry , paleontology , biology
Extensive literature has addressed the acute cognitive effects of breaking a fast. Recent reviews in this line of work have synthesized available research on the cognitive consequences of fasting compared with nutrient intake and the cognitive effects of macronutrient consumption. These largely have been inconclusive, possibly in part because of selection criteria limiting the scope of studies covered. The purpose of the current review is to integrate the results of the literature examining the cognitive effects of breakfast and breakfast composition in adults with the use of a flexible definition of breakfast, specifically, any caloric intake after a fasting period of ≥8 h. This review includes 38 studies that examine the acute cognitive impact of breakfast and 16 studies that examine the effects of breakfast composition. Results suggest that healthy adults show a small but robust advantage for memory (particularly delayed recall) from consuming breakfast. Largely equivocal results emerge for attention and motor and executive function; there were no effects from breakfast on language. Regarding breakfast composition, a smaller number of studies and widely disparate methodology addressing this question preclude definitive conclusions about the effects of cognition. A subset of this literature examines these questions in the context of glucoregulation; the findings emphasize the importance of considering differences in glucoregulation in research designs, even among healthy cohorts. The limitations of this literature include methodologic differences, such as the use of different tests to measure cognitive constructs, as well as the effects of timing in test administration.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom