Midterm results of total knee replacement with single-radius vs. multi-radius posterior stabilised implants | Zendy

Roman Ciprian Oliviu | Zendy; Ancuţa Zazgyva | Zendy; Sâmpalean Septimiu | Zendy; Örs Nagy | Zendy; Tudor Sorin Pop | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Midterm results of total knee replacement with single-radius vs. multi-radius posterior stabilised implants

Author(s) -

Roman Ciprian Oliviu,

Ancuţa Zazgyva,

Sâmpalean Septimiu,

Örs Nagy,

Tudor Sorin Pop

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.586

H-Index - 28

eISSN - 2589-1294

pISSN - 1017-995X

DOI - 10.3944/aott.2015.15.0050

Subject(s) - medicine , survivorship curve , implant , total knee arthroplasty , confidence interval , surgery , radius , arthroplasty , osteoarthritis , range of motion , knee joint , retrospective cohort study , joint replacement , total knee replacement , alternative medicine , computer security , pathology , cancer , computer science

Single-radius femoral total knee endoprosthesis designs were introduced with the promise of better clinical and functional results by means of superior biomechanical characteristics. The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term clinical, functional, radiologic, and survivorship outcomes of 2 types of posterior-stabilized knee replacement systems: the single-radius Scorpio® (Stryker®, Mahwah, NJ, USA) and the multi-radius NexGen® (Zimmer®, Warsaw, IN, USA).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research