z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The comparing of homogenization methods for oxidative and antioxidative analyses of sperm
Author(s) -
Ömer Varışlı,
Numan Akyol
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
turkish journal of veterinary and animal sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.233
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1303-6181
pISSN - 1300-0128
DOI - 10.3906/vet-1802-10
Subject(s) - homogenization (climate) , sperm , oxidative phosphorylation , semen , oxidative damage , antioxidant , chemistry , oxidative stress , ceruloplasmin , andrology , biochemistry , biology , medicine , biodiversity , ecology
Pretreatment of sperm for oxidative and antioxidative analysis has been shown to be different in studies. These differences can affect the result of analyses. The aim of this study was to compare the analyses of sperm homogenization methods. The semen of four rams were used in the study. Pretreatment procedures included the rotary, bead, and ultrasonic homogenization methods. Oxidative and antioxidative status of sperm samples was assessed by measuring serum lipid hydroperoxide, total oxidant status, free sulfhydryl groups (SH total thiol), ceruloplasmin, and total antioxidant capacity levels. As a result, the homogenization methods before oxidative and antioxidative status analyses significantly affected the result (P < 0.05), and the ultrasonic homogenization method was the most effective. It is recommended to use the ultrasonic homogenization as a pretreatment method to determine the oxidative and antioxidative status analyses in sperm.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom