z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Tolerance and avoidance responses to salinity and water stresses in Calotropis procera and Suaeda aegyptiaca
Author(s) -
Ali H. Ibrahim
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
turkish journal of agriculture and forestry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.624
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1303-6173
pISSN - 1300-011X
DOI - 10.3906/tar-1202-62
Subject(s) - calotropis procera , salinity , procera , proline , biology , horticulture , shoot , botany , plant physiology , waterlogging (archaeology) , dry weight , chlorophyll , agronomy , amino acid , ecology , wetland , biochemistry
This study was designed to evaluate the response of 2 wild shrubs, Calotropis procera and Suaeda aegyptiaca, to salinity (100% seawater), drought, and waterlogging stresses. The 90-day-old plants were subjected to the stress treatments for 3 weeks, and growth and some physiological parameters were evaluated. The total plant dry mass of C. procera plants was reduced by 40%, whereas S. aegyptiaca was not significantly affected by salinity stress. Water deficit and waterlogging stresses significantly reduced the total dry mass of both species. Under all conditions, the root/shoot ratio in C. procera was 3-fold higher than in S. aegyptiaca. All applied stresses markedly increased leaf shedding in C. procera plants only. These plants appeared to have a higher salinity and waterlogging stress intensity index as manifested by chlorophyll levels lower than those in S. aegyptiaca. Under all conditions, Na+ levels of S. aegyptiaca were twice those of C. procera plants. All stresses reduced the K+/Na+ ratio in C. procera leaves. On the other hand, S. aegyptiaca plants were able to maintain this ratio near control levels under salinity and drought stresses. Consequently, S. aegyptiaca leaves had higher partial osmotic pressure than C. procera. The proline and total free amino acids levels in C. procera were between 1.3- and 2-fold higher than in S. aegyptiaca. Among all amino acids, the common change in both species under all stresses was an accumulation of free proline and a decrease in methionine levels. The results revealed that the response of both species to salinity and water stresses included avoidance and tolerance mechanisms with some differences between them.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom