z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On separating subadditive maps
Author(s) -
Vesko Valov
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
turkish journal of mathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.454
H-Index - 27
eISSN - 1303-6149
pISSN - 1300-0098
DOI - 10.3906/mat-1401-12
Subject(s) - subadditivity , bijection , mathematics , combinatorics , surjective function , additive function , banach space , discrete mathematics , mathematical analysis
Recall that a map T \colon C(X,E) \to C(Y,F), where X, Y are Tychonoff spaces and E, F are normed spaces, is said to be separating, if for any 2 functions f,g \in C(X,E) we have c(T(f)) \cap c(T(g))= \varnothing provided c(f) \cap c(g) = \varnothing. Here c(f) is the co-zero set of f. A typical result generalizing the Banach--Stone theorem is of the following type (established by Araujo): if T is bijective and additive such that both T and T-1 are separating, then the realcompactification n X of X is homeomorphic to n Y. In this paper we show that a similar result is true if additivity is replaced by subadditivity (a map T is called subadditive if ||T(f+g)(y)|| \leq ||T(f)(y)||+ ||T(g)(y)|| for any f,g \in C(X,E) and any y \in Y). Here is our main result (a stronger version is actually established): if T \colon C(X,E) \to C(Y,F) is a separating subadditive map, then there exists a continuous map SY\colon b Y \rightarrow b X. Moreover, SY is surjective provided T(f)=0 iff f=0. In particular, when T is a bijection such that both T and T-1 are separating and subadditive, b X is homeomorphic to b Y. We also provide an example of a biseparating subadditive map from C(R) onto C(R), which is not additive.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom