English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In our paper in Figure 34A and in the text (page 73), we incorrectly attributed a portion of the angular to the dentary as a process “ventral to the external mandibular fenestra,” as occurs in some crocodylomorphs. Th e dentary in Kaprosuchus lacks a posteroventral process and only has a posterodorsal process dorsal to the external mandibular fenestra (Fig. 1). Th e angular, which forms the entire ventral margin of the fenestra, is marked by a prominent ridge at mid length and is completely coossifi ed with the prearticular. Th is correction alters the scoring of a single character in our paper (character 181: dentary extension beneath mandibular fenestra; Appendix, p. 124). With Kaprosuchus correctly scored with state 1 (absent), rather than state 0 (present) as in the original Appendix (p. 138), our original phylogenetic trees (Fig. 43) remain unchanged. Tree length (985 steps), however, is one step shorter than initially reported (986 steps). Th e erroneous state had been interpreted as an autapomorphy for Kaprosuchus. ZooKeys 29: 73–74 (2009) doi: 10.3897/zookeys.29.368 www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys

Corrigenda: Sereno PC, Larsson HCE (2009) Cretaceous Crocodyliforms from the Sahara. ZooKeys 28: 1–143.