z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Challenges of qualitative data sharing in social sciences
Author(s) -
Tanja Vučković Juroš
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
european science editing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.19
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 2518-3354
pISSN - 0258-3127
DOI - 10.3897/ese.2022.e77781
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , accountability , open science , sanctions , data sharing , qualitative research , political science , open data , engineering ethics , sociology , public relations , social science , engineering , medicine , law , physics , alternative medicine , pathology , astronomy
Open science offers hope for new accountability and transparency in social sciences. Nevertheless, it still fails to fully consider the complexities of qualitative research, as exemplified by a reflection on sensitive qualitative data sharing. As a result, the developing patterns of rewards and sanctions promoting open science raise concern that quantitative research, whose “replication crisis” brought the open science movement to life, will benefit from “good science” re-evaluations at the expense of other research epistemologies, despite the necessity to define accountability and transparency in social sciences more widely and not to conflate those with either reproducibility or data sharing.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom