Exploring the relationship between journal indexing and article processing charges of journals published by MDPI, the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | Zendy

Hilary I. Okagbue | Zendy; Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva | Zendy; T. A. Anake | Zendy

Open Access

Exploring the relationship between journal indexing and article processing charges of journals published by MDPI, the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Author(s) -

Hilary I. Okagbue,

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,

T. A. Anake

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

european science editing

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.19

H-Index - 12

eISSN - 2518-3354

pISSN - 0258-3127

DOI - 10.3897/ese.2020.e54523

Subject(s) - scopus , publishing , library science , web of science , impact factor , analytics , electronic publishing , multidisciplinary approach , digital era , digital library , medicine , political science , computer science , social science , medline , sociology , meta analysis , world wide web , data science , the internet , philosophy , law , poetry , linguistics

The Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) is a prominent open access (OA) publisher that uses article processing charges (APCs) as its business model. Our objective was to determine the association between the APCs levied by MDPI journals and 1) their inclusion in Scopus and Web of Science databases or 2) their stature, as represented by their CiteScore (Elsevier’s Scopus) and Impact Factor (awarded by Clarivate Analytics). Among the 227 journals published by MDPI, 51 had both IF and CiteScore; 107, only a CiteScore; and 84, neither IF nor CiteScore. The charges levied by the journals varied widely, from 0 to CHF 2000 (Swiss francs), the most frequent figure (159 journals) being CHF 1000, or about €930. The amount of APCs was found to be correlated to IF (R² = 0.64; p <0.001; 107 journals) and also to CiteScore (R² = 0.619; p <0.001; 53 journals). The charges levied by journals that had both IF and CiteScore were significantly higher than those charged by journals with neither IF nor CiteScore (p <0.05). The charges were also correlated to the age of the journal: the more recently launched journals charged less than the older journals did.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research