z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prognostic performance of a series of model for end-stage liver disease and respective Δ scores in patients with hepatitis B acute-on-chronic liver failure
Author(s) -
Yunhao Xun,
Junping Shi,
Chunqing Li,
Dan Li,
Wei-zhen Shi,
Qingchun Pan,
Jianchun Guo,
Guoqing Zang
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
molecular medicine reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.727
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1791-3004
pISSN - 1791-2997
DOI - 10.3892/mmr.2014.1983
Subject(s) - medicine , liver disease , model for end stage liver disease , gastroenterology , receiver operating characteristic , hepatitis b , liver failure , stage (stratigraphy) , chronic hepatitis , liver transplantation , biology , immunology , transplantation , paleontology , virus
The present study aimed to compare the short-term prognostic performance of a series of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and respective delta (∆) scores scoring systems in a population with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure (ACHBLF), and to investigate the potential effects from antivirals. A total of 77 patients with ACHBLF of mean age 46 years, 82% male, with 58.4% receiving antivirals, were recruited for this study. The ∆ scores for MELDs were defined as the changes one week after admission. Thirty‑eight (49%) patients (22 treated with antivirals) died within three months. The mean MELD and ∆MELD scores of the survival group were 19.5 ± 4.4 and 0.2 ± 3.7 respectively, and those of the mortality group were 23.5 ± 5.5 and 7.9 ± 6, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MELD, integrated MELD (iMELD), MELD with the addition of serum sodium (MELD-Na), updated MELD (upMELD), MELD excluding the international normalized ratio (INR; MELD-XI), United Kingdom MELD (UKMELD) and their ∆ scores were 0.72, 0.81, 0.77, 0.69, 0.65, 0.77 and 0.86, 0.83, 0.83, 0.82, 0.79 and 0.79, respectively. iMELD and MELD-Na significantly improved the accuracy of MELD (P<0.05). A cut-off value of 41.5 for the iMELD score can prognose 71% of mortalities with a specificity of 85%. In each pair of models, the ∆ score was superior to its counterpart, particularly when applied to patients with MELD ≤ 30. Decreased accuracy was observed for all models in the subset of patients treated with antivirals, although their baseline characteristics were comparable to those of untreated patients, while iMELD, MELD-Na and respective ∆ models remained superior with regard to the predictability. The iMELD and MELD-Na models predicted three-month mortality more accurately, while the ∆ models were superior to their counterparts when MELD ≤ 30; however, their performance was altered by antivirals, and thus requires optimization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom