Effectiveness of tipranavir versus darunavir as a salvage therapy in HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients
Author(s) -
Juan Carlos Domínguez-Hermosillo,
José Antonio MataMarín,
Norma Estela Herrera-González,
Marcelino Chávez-García,
Gloria Huerta-García,
Nohemí Núñez-Rodríguez,
José Gerardo García-Gámez,
Anai Jiménez-Romero,
Jesús GaytánMartínez
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the journal of infection in developing countries
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.322
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 2036-6590
pISSN - 1972-2680
DOI - 10.3855/jidc.6629
Subject(s) - darunavir , medicine , ritonavir , interquartile range , enfuvirtide , salvage therapy , viral load , raltegravir , regimen , population , protease inhibitor (pharmacology) , gastroenterology , virology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , immunology , antiretroviral therapy , chemotherapy , environmental health , antigen , gp41 , epitope
Although both tipranavir (TPV) and darunavir (DRV) represent important options for the management of patients with multi-protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), currently there are no studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in the Mexican population. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TPV versus DRV as a salvage therapy in HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom