z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cross Burning as Hate Speech Under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Author(s) -
Wilson Ray Huhn
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
amsterdam law forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1876-8156
DOI - 10.37974/alf.94
Subject(s) - theme (computing) , constitution , law , section (typography) , political science , sociology , library science , media studies , advertising , computer science , business , operating system
Cross burning is a particularly vicious form of “hate speech.” Some American states and cities have enacted laws prohibiting cross burning, and in two cases (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) and Virginia v. Black (2003)) the United States Supreme Court has issued decisions regarding the constitutionality of those laws. These cases establish the principle that under the First Amendment hate speech is not punishable as a crime unless the speaker intended to threaten another person or the speaker intended to incite an imminent act of violence. Furthermore, the cases reinforce the principle that under the First Amendment a person may be convicted of a expressive crime only if the law under which the defendant was charged is narrowly drawn to prohibit only “unprotected” speech.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom