Differences in Rust in Hearing Aid Batteries across Four Manufacturers, Four Battery Sizes, and Five Durations of Exposure
Author(s) -
Michael Valente,
Jamie Cadieux,
Laura Flowers,
John G. Newman,
Juergen Scherer,
Greg Gephart
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of the american academy of audiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.794
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 2157-3107
pISSN - 1050-0545
DOI - 10.3766/jaaa.18.10.4
Subject(s) - rust (programming language) , audiology , medicine , computer science , programming language
Three hundred twenty zinc-air batteries representing four manufacturers (Energizer, Power One, Duracell, and Ray-O-Vac) and four cell sizes (10, 312, 13, and 675) were exposed in a salt spray fog apparatus for 2.5, 5.5, 24, 48, and 72 hours. At the conclusion of each exposure, the batteries were rated blindly for the presence of rust by four experienced audiologists using a four point rating scale. Results revealed significant differences in the rating of rust across the four manufacturers and duration of exposure. No statistically significant difference was found across cell size. Also, the correlation between raters was exceptionally high indicating that each audiologist rated the presence of rust for each battery in a very similar manner. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) techniques were applied and provided answers for the observed differences in rust between the four manufacturers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom