A Weak Theory of Strong Readings
Author(s) -
Daniel Büring
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v6i0.2779
Subject(s) - computer science , mathematics , natural language processing
Below the examples I have given paraphrases of the readings we are concerned with here, and which seem the most natural ones for these examples. To see that these are remarkable , let us briefly recapitulate what the interpretat ion of a wel l behaved adnominal quantifier should look like . Syntactical ly a quant ifier l ike some in (1) has as its sister a nominal argument, which for lack of commitment I refer to as the N-argument. The resulting NP (DP) is s ister to a verbal projection, labeled the V-argument in the remainder of this paper. Ideal ly , we would like the meaning of N to provide the first argument the restrictor of the quantifier , and V to provide the second the nuclear scope in the semantics . An ideal mapping would thus be as in (4) .
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom