z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Weak Theory of Strong Readings
Author(s) -
Daniel Büring
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v6i0.2779
Subject(s) - computer science , mathematics , natural language processing
Below the examples I have given paraphrases of the readings we are concerned with here, and which seem the most natural ones for these examples. To see that these are remarkable , let us briefly recapitulate what the interpretat ion of a wel l behaved adnominal quantifier should look like . Syntactical ly a quant ifier l ike some in (1) has as its sister a nominal argument, which for lack of commitment I refer to as the N-argument. The resulting NP (DP) is s ister to a verbal projection, labeled the V-argument in the remainder of this paper. Ideal ly , we would like the meaning of N to provide the first argument the restrictor of the quantifier , and V to provide the second the nuclear scope in the semantics . An ideal mapping would thus be as in (4) .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom