z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Relevance of Polarity for the Online Interpretation of Scalar Terms
Author(s) -
Danièle Panizza,
Yi Ting Huang,
Gennaro Chierchia,
Jesse Snedeker
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-5951
pISSN - 2163-5943
DOI - 10.3765/salt.v19i0.2530
Subject(s) - polarity (international relations) , interpretation (philosophy) , relevance (law) , scalar (mathematics) , natural language processing , computer science , artificial intelligence , information retrieval , mathematics , theoretical computer science , chemistry , geometry , programming language , political science , cell , law , biochemistry
Numeral determiners (such as two, three etc.) and scalar quantifiers (such as some) are known to have different interpretations. Under one interpretation, two and some have an upper bounded or strong meaning, where two means 'two and not more' (or 'exactly two') and some means 'some but not all'. Alternately these words can be interpreted with a lower bounded or weak meaning, where two means 'at least two' (or 'two or more') and some means 'at least some' (or 'some and possibly all'). For example, consider the following dialogue in which speaker (A) interrogates speaker (B) about the quantity of cupcakes eaten by Alan.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom