z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
NPIs Pragmatically
Author(s) -
Elana Herberger,
Simon Mauck
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
proceedings of the annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2377-1666
pISSN - 0363-2946
DOI - 10.3765/bls.v35i1.3627
Subject(s) - political science , geography
Some contexts are more obviously downward entailing than others. Thus, it is clear that the negation in (1a) creates a DE context, but it is not quite as clear that the if in (1c) does. Moreover, some NPIs only like certain kinds of DE contexts and which ones occur in which contexts is an interesting question which has received considerable attention in the literature. We would like to abstract away from these issues here, however, and address another one: Why should NPIs be limited to semantically negative contexts, contexts that invert the direction of entailment (Fauconnier 1975)? Recent analyses attempt to answer this question by exploiting the semantics of NPIs (cf. Krifka 1995, Lahiri 1998, Chierchia 2006). We argue that while the distributional restrictions of NPIs are indeed related to their meanings, the distributional restriction of NPIs cannot be derived from for their meanings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom