Forest nurseries face critical choices with the loss of methyl bromide fumigation
Author(s) -
Jerry E. Weiland,
Will R. Littke,
Diane L. Haase
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v067n03p153
Subject(s) - fumigation , bromide , pest control , container (type theory) , quality (philosophy) , business , pest analysis , environmental science , agroforestry , ecology , biology , chemistry , engineering , marketing , mechanical engineering , philosophy , organic chemistry , epistemology
Forest nurseries in the western United States have relied for decades on methyl bromide to control soilborne pests. Numerous studies have investigated alternative fumigants, alternative application methods and nonfumigant approaches for their ability to reduce soilborne pest populations and produce quality, disease-free seedlings. We review the recent studies and identify where research is needed to assist the industry's transition away from methyl bromide. For the immediate, foreseeable future, an integrated approach combining nonfumigant and fumigant methods will provide the best strategy. Nevertheless, the industry may need to transition completely to container production if fumigant regulations become more restrictive.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom