z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PCR and antibody methods: Research compares two cattle feed tests that detect bovine byproduct contaminants
Author(s) -
Μ. Μ. Sawyer,
Wayne L. Smith,
Gabriel J. Rensen,
Bennie I. Osburn,
James S. Cullor
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v059n04p212
Subject(s) - contamination , beef cattle , ruminant , food science , meat and bone meal , microbiology and biotechnology , disease control , biology , food safety , animal health , polymerase chain reaction , veterinary medicine , zoology , medicine , agronomy , fish meal , ecology , biochemistry , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , gene , crop
Preventing the spread of mad cow disease through contaminated cattle feed is a major concern of beef and dairy producers, regulators and consumers around the world. Routine testing of cattle feeds for the presence of banned substances is a critical control point in assuring animal health and food safety. We compared the results of two test procedures (a real-time polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assay and a commercially available ruminant antibody detection kit) on five cattle rations spiked with bovine meat-and-bone meal, or with bovine dried blood. The real-time PCR consistently detected these contaminants at lower levels in each of these diverse cattle rations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom