z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Various novel insecticides are less toxic to humans, more specific to key pests
Author(s) -
Elizabeth E. GraftonCardwell,
L. D. Godfrey,
William E. Chaney,
W. J. Bentley
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v059n01p29
Subject(s) - pyrethroid , biology , toxicology , pesticide , insect growth regulator , insect , neonicotinoid , carbamate , pest control , organophosphate , acre , pest analysis , microbiology and biotechnology , ecology , agronomy , imidacloprid , botany , biochemistry
A number of novel insecticides have recently been registered for insect control in agriculture. A major advan- tage of these new products is that they act on insect biological processes that humans do not experience, such as molting. Many also have greater selectivity to target specific species, so they are less likely to harm natural enemies when compared with the broader spectrum organophosphate, carbamate, neonicotinoid and pyre- throid insecticides. Such novel insec- ticides currently in use include four targeting lepidopteran pests, three targeting sucking insects, one specific to dipteran leafminers and one insect growth regulator that controls a wide range of insects. One negative aspect of these insecticides is that because of their narrower range of activity — controlling only a limited number of pests — growers may need to apply additional pesticides for secondary pest groups that have poor biological control, increasing the total number of treatments per acre and total pest- control costs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom