Improving irrigation systems conserves water in greenhouse-grown cut flowers
Author(s) -
Kurt F. Schulbach,
S. A. Tjosvold,
Danyal Kasapligil
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v053n02p44
Subject(s) - low flow irrigation systems , irrigation , greenhouse , drip irrigation , environmental science , perimeter , center pivot irrigation , flushing , rust (programming language) , agricultural engineering , agronomy , mathematics , computer science , engineering , biology , geometry , programming language , endocrinology
In our evaluation of three microirrigation systems used in greenhouse cut-flower production, the systems' ability to apply water uniformly varied widely. The most common irrigation system, the perimeter system, generally applied water less consistently than other tested systems. Center riser and drip irrigation systems generally applied water more uniformly than the perimeter system. And while many perimeter irrigation systems could be retrofitted to improve water distribution, all irrigation systems could be improved with a regular maintenance program consisting of flushing rust and other particulates from irrigation pipe, and chemically controlling biological growth in irrigation pipe.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom