Farmers describe irrigation costs, benefits: Labor costs may offset water savings of sprinkler systems
Author(s) -
Dennis Wichelns,
Laurie Houston,
David Cone,
Qiming Zhu,
James E. Wilen
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v050n01p11
Subject(s) - irrigation , environmental science , surface irrigation , capital cost , water resource management , offset (computer science) , irrigation management , san joaquin , water conservation , leaching (pedology) , agricultural engineering , business , computer science , economics , engineering , soil water , ecology , biology , soil science , macroeconomics , programming language
In recent years San Joaquin Valley farmers have improved irrigation methods to reduce subsurface drain water and make more efficient use of limited water supplies. Water-saving methods include sprinklers and gated pipe. However, these methods involve higher labor and energy costs, which may exceed the value of water saved when switching from surface irrigation methods, such as furrow irrigation with siphon tubes. Although more expensive, when sprinklers are used correctly they provide better leaching of salts while generating less subsurface drain water than surface methods. Public policies that reduce the capital cost of investing in sprinkler systems, and research to develop better surface irrigation methods, will assist farmers in continuing their efforts to improve irrigation water management while maintaining economic viability.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom